![]() ![]() To make our evaluation process as efficient as possible, we focus on cause areas that we believe are especially promising: those that are large in scope, highly tractable, and relatively neglected. However, we have limited resources, and we find that it’s more efficient to focus on a smaller group of charities that seem likely to be particularly effective. We could, in principle, attempt to evaluate every animal charity and then hone in on the most effective ones. ACE, on the other hand, aims to identify only the most effective animal charities. Since watchdog groups aim to identify any wrongdoing in their sector, they often conduct relatively shallow quality checks of a large number of organizations. ![]() We have much less in common with organizations that monitor and report on large classes of charities, such as Guidestar and Charity Navigator. In this respect, our closest counterparts are other effective altruism research and evaluative organizations, such as GiveWell and the Open Philanthropy Project. Our approach is consistent with our commitment to effective altruism, the project of using evidence and reason to do as much good as possible. To carry out our mission, we conduct and analyze research in order to provide information about effective interventions and charities. Our impact as an organization comes from influencing funding to the most effective animal charities and influencing the movement to value effectiveness. The number of animals suffering today is huge compared to the small amount of resources being invested in reducing that suffering, so it is crucial that the movement’s resources are spent as effectively as possible. Our mission is to find and promote the most effective ways to help animals. Why We Work to Identify the Most Effective Charities Uses positive reinforcement to elevate the best performers and improve the movement Uses negative reinforcement to compel change in the worst performers and improve the movement Recommends particularly effective animal charities to donors Invites the most promising charities to participate in the evaluation process, and only publishes reviews with their approvalĪlerts citizens, consumers, and donors to inefficient and/or corrupt activities Independently investigates organizations under their scope Identifies and promotes the most effective animal charitiesĪims to oversee all organizations within the relevant sectorĮvaluates only the charities that seem likely to be among the most effective Provides oversight for governments, industries, or movements Here is a summary of some key differences between a watchdog organization and ACE: In doing so, we contribute to the movement by providing positive incentives for charities that are carrying out effectiveness-oriented programs and fostering healthy organizational cultures to sustain them. Rather, we aim to identify particularly effective animal charities and direct resources towards them. We do not aim to monitor the entire animal advocacy movement or call attention to bad actors. ![]() ![]() Even though watchdog organizations are extremely valuable, we view ACE’s role quite differently. Watchdog organizations view their role as providing oversight for governments, industries, or movements. ACE is an evaluator that aims to find the few most effective charities, not a watchdog organization that aims to highlight bad actors. The answers to each of these questions is related to ACE’s role in the movement.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |